Conflict with NeuostlandOn the evening of March 24, the Supreme Command of the Kriegsmacht recorded the activity of sabotage groups on the sovereign territory of Great Prussia, in its very heart — Central Jutland. It was established that these groups were linked to Neuostland and Regnum Ultramar of the CBT bloc.
Despite the absence of direct actions or damage against Prussia, the situation constitutes an act of aggression against the Prussian State, aimed at destabilization and the incitement of disorder, expressed through intimidation and direct action. The Supreme Command immediately dispatched a volunteer contingent to Jutland to ensure the security of the people and the state, and to prevent any further provocations. Shortly thereafter, the sabotage groups of the potential adversary withdrew from Prussian territory.
Throughout and following the provocation, Neuostland issued no formal note, comment, or statement. On the contrary, after the incident, Neuostland accused Great Prussia of allegedly attempting to disrupt its purchase of the formerly Prussian region of Sudovia.
The Kronrat is prepared to refute this disinformation: a number of Baltic regions, including Sudovia, as previously East Prussia and Memel, had been put up for open sale by their current holders from the Trade Federation. During negotiations conducted within market mechanisms, Great Prussia received an offer to purchase the region and, having reached an agreement, was subsequently informed by the seller that a third party had intervened with a demand not to proceed with the sale in our favor. The region was ultimately purchased by Neuostland, which declared its “liberation.”
Neuostland, which had previously openly supported the plundering of the Prussian treasury by Diana Ukkele and entered into an anti-Prussian arrangement for profit, has once again demonstrated diplomatic short-sightedness. Acting on unfounded assumptions, it interfered in a third-party transaction and, without attempting to clarify the situation through official channels, proceeded to attempt an incursion. Even from a domestic legal standpoint, Volksmacht forces are not authorized to conduct such operations, as they are permissible only in the case of a direct violation of sovereignty. Therefore, this constitutes a clear act of aggression.
The Kronrat condemns the short-sighted and provocative actions of its new regional neighbor but does not yield to them: all actions and statements of Neuostland are recorded and soberly assessed. A subject of the King, Otto Vorgelung, addressed the rulers of Neuostland in a personal capacity and received a response that they were dissatisfied with the humorous rhetoric of members of the Kronrat toward their state. At the same time, being unable to properly assess the “negotiator” from Prussia, Neuostland later claimed that it had “conveyed its complaints to the Supreme Ruler through Vorgelung,” while refusing to disclose the substance of these claims to His Majesty Constantine III, King of Prussia
.His Majesty continued personal communication with the rulers of Neuostland during an informal exchange that took place between them and members of the Kronrat on March 26, and secured from Neuostland private apologies for misunderstanding, disinformation, and the dissemination of anti-Prussian propaganda — part of the materials in Neuostland’s official source was subsequently removed.
