ANTHRO Compass 🧭

Anthropology Paper-2 Probables 2026 Our most probable Paper 2 questions, carefully identified through PYQ trends, topic gaps, recency and the most relevant 2025–26 developments. All the best guys❤️ @ANTHROCompass

Anthropology Paper-1 Probables 2026 Our most probable Paper 1 questions, derived from PYQ frequency, recency, gaps and 2025–26 developments. @ANTHROCompass

[media, no text]

Important for Mains 2026 Picking the right set is just as important as your preparation. No single document or last-minute notes can help you as much as consolidating what you have already studied and, ultimately, picking the right set in the exam. We’ve analysed how set selection can work in the optional paper to maximise your score. Use the 2025 actual paper as a practical formula to identify your own sweet spots, and then go through our detailed analysis below. Link to earlier Question-set analysis @ANTHROCompass

Case Study: Supreme Court on Muslim Polygamy (PAPER-I) The Supreme Court has sought the Union Government's response to a PIL seeking abolition of polygamy among Muslims, with petitioners challenging Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, which permits up to four wives, as allegedly inconsistent with Articles 14, 15 and 16. NFHS-5 (2019–21) recorded polygamy among Christians (2.1%), Muslims (1.9%) and Hindus (1.3%), showing that the practice cuts across religious communities. 💍Polygyny — 2.3 Types of Marriage The case illustrates the tension between cultural/religious sanction and contemporary legal regulation. Uttarakhand's UCC bans bigamy and polygamy, though Scheduled Tribes are exempted, demonstrating variation in the legal regulation of marriage. 🖼 Gender & Power — 2.3 Feminist Critique of Marriage The PIL seeks abolition on grounds of gender equality, while petitioners have sought protection of the first wife and children. It therefore enables a feminist reading of polygyny as a site where marital rights, power and gender inequality intersect. 🧑‍⚖️ Judicial Transformation — 2.3 Contemporary Changes in Marriage In Javed (2003), the Supreme Court held that although Muslim Personal Law permits multiple wives, polygamy is not an essential religious practice protected under Article 25. Shayara Bano (2017) invalidated instant triple talaq while leaving polygamy and nikah halala open for future adjudication. 📖 Conversion & Bigamy — 2.3 Marriage Regulations / Contemporary Changes Sarla Mudgal (1995) and Lily Thomas (2000) held that a non-Muslim husband cannot convert to Islam merely to evade bigamy restrictions and contract another marriage. Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande (1965) established that conviction for bigamy requires the second marriage to have been validly solemnised with the requisite ceremonies. ⚖️ Contemporary Legal Framework — 2.3 Marriage Regulations Under Section 82 of the BNS, 2023, bigamy is a criminal offence for those to whom the provision applies, punishable by up to 7 years' imprisonment. The differential legal treatment of communities, alongside the UCC debate, illustrates the continuing negotiation between personal law, constitutional equality and uniform regulation of marriage. The case demonstrates that marriage is culturally variable but continually transformed by law, gender norms and social change. Polygyny can therefore be examined simultaneously as a form of marriage (Murdock), a system of social relations, and a site of gendered power and contemporary legal transformation. @ANTHROCompass

Case Study: Ken–Betwa River-Linking Project — Adivasi Resistance (Paper-II) The Ken–Betwa River-Linking Project involves a 231-km canal transferring water from the Ken to Betwa for irrigation and drinking water. It will submerge 10 villages, while another 12 villages face displacement around the Panna Tiger Reserve, affecting about 22 villages in Panna–Chhatarpur. Daudhan (~700 people) and Narauli (~300, largely Gond) are among the affected settlements. 👥 Socio-cultural impact — 6.3 Tribal Displacement / 7.2 Social Change For forest-dependent communities, displacement means loss of farmland, forests, river access and village-based social networks. Narauli residents depend on mahua, charwa, tendu and other forest produce, while villagers describe the Ken, forest and village as their janam bhoomi. Thus, displacement threatens livelihood, cultural attachment and community identity, illustrating Julian Steward's cultural ecology. 🎁 Rehabilitation — 6.3 Rehabilitation Affected persons aged 18+ in February 2024 were eligible for ₹12.5 lakh compensation + ₹5 lakh per acre of acquired land. However, many Adivasi families reportedly lack patta land, limiting access to compensation. Their demand for land-for-land and village-for-village rehabilitation shows that cash cannot replace common resources and social life. → Cernea's IRR model: landlessness, loss of common property and social disarticulation. 😭 Social disruption — 6.3 Tribal Displacement / Rehabilitation Villagers fear that relocation will separate them from established community networks, ancestral homes and familiar landscapes. Hence, they demand collective rather than fragmented resettlement, illustrating Scudder–Colson's stress-and-settlement model, where displacement involves psychological stress and difficulty in reconstructing community life. 🪵 Ecological impact — 6.3 Developmental Projects A 2017 Forest Advisory Committee assessment estimated ~23 lakh trees would be felled. For communities dependent on forest produce, ecological destruction simultaneously produces livelihood insecurity and cultural disruption. → Roy Rappaport: subsistence, social organisation and ecological systems are interlinked. 🌍 Resistance — 7.3 Tribal Unrest / Rights over Resources The Chita Aandolan , a symbolic pyre protest, saw significant participation by Adivasi women. Villagers also mobilised collectively against the project, demanding land, forest, water and participatory rehabilitation. The case therefore shows how resource alienation and displacement can generate tribal mobilisation and resistance. @ANTHROCompass

Paper-2 not-so boring anymore. We’ve added the right diagrams, facts and thinkers to turn your GS-style answers into optional worthy answers

✅Day 7: Diagramification of your Mains Answer 🏹Theme: Fertilizer Overuse (NPK Imbalance), the highest-ROI diagram of the series so far. One drawing fits into Organic Farming (the need), Soil Degradation, Fertilizer Subsidy reform, Sustainable Agriculture, long-term Crop Productivity... practically half the GS3 agriculture syllabus. And notice what this format does: Current (10.9 : 4.1 : 1.68) standing right next to Ideal (4 : 2 : 1), the diagram itself makes your argument. You never have to write "there is a severe imbalance in fertilizer use in India." The two sets of bars are already shouting it. A diagram that argues > a diagram that decorates. 💡One theme done, five answers ready such multi-purpose diagrams in the GS1,2,3,4 Diagram Booklets on Civil Services Compass app (click here) ✉️Follow our channel here

📌 PYQs (2013–2025): Paper 2 Microthemes ✅ Every PYQ decoded into microthemes ✅ Spot recurring trends instantly @ANTHROCompass

📌 PYQs (2013–2025): Paper 1 Microthemes ✅ Every PYQ decoded into microthemes ✅ Spot recurring trends instantly Paper 2 Microthemes releasing soon. @ANTHROCompass

[media, no text]

⤵️ D.N. Majumdar | Thinker Series #05

[media, no text]

⤵️ M.N. Srinivas | Thinker Series #04

[media, no text]

⤵️ G.S.Ghurye | Thinker Series #03