Herat protests, "personal freedoms", liberalism and the truth on coercion in Shari'ah
The recent protests staged in Herat by some dayyuths, feminists and murtaddin against the long-delayed arrests of mutabarrijat on the basis of their violation of hijab policies, have once again startled not only the usual crow of western liberals, feminist murtaddin, "universal human rights" mushrikin NGOs etc, but also the usual crowd of ikhwano-salafee izlamists, whose western liberal-affected minds can't conceive the concept of coercion in religious matters - and that's why we hear their useless "where is the daleel, akhee" outrage, every time the blessed Islamic Imarah (which is a traditional Islamic polity based on actual classical fiqh, and not a cringe "Izlamist party" dreaming of elections, pluralism, democracy, "Islamic Republics" and "Islamizing modernity") violates their idol of "personal freedoms" and their ideas of effeminate pseudo-"da'wah" and "hikmah" (a previous example of such outrage took place at the time of the arrest and sending to rehab of a pair of clowns aping some mafia fussaq kuffar victorian criminals from some idiotic TV serials).
As for the protests, imagine being such a dayyuth who can't even have their womenfolk cover their head properly (let alone keep them at home and not let them roam around with caked-up faces, prostitutes-like heels and tabarruji FaShIoNaBlE GuLf abayahs or worse), who never raised his voice against kafir occupation army raping Muslim Afghan women, but suddenly finding back their "manhood" to choose to die protesting over the (unexistant) "right" of their women to continue to publicly violate proper Shari'ah conduct after having exhausted the authorities' formidable patience by constantly showing their cringe fasiq fasid shaytani "defiance" by refusing to cover properly, in the hope of getting some well-deserved reactions so as to cry in front of international kafir media and NGOs and applying for humanitarian asylum in some harbi countries.
