GED RLA Extended Response (Essay) မေးခွန်းနှင့် ဖြေဆိုပုံ နမူနာ
Part 1: Sample Passage (စာဖတ်ခန်း)
Prompt: Read the following two articles about four-day workweeks. Write an essay analyzing which position is better supported with evidence.
Passage 1: The Case for a Four-Day Workweek
By Mark Jenkins
Transitioning to a four-day workweek is the most logical step for modern businesses. According to a 2022 study conducted in the United Kingdom involving 61 companies, 92% of businesses that tested a four-day workweek decided to continue with it. The study revealed a 35% increase in revenue compared to similar periods in previous years, and employee burnout dropped by 71%.
When workers are rested, their concentration improves, leading to fewer errors and higher productivity. Furthermore, reducing office operation by one day significantly decreases carbon emissions and operational utility costs. Opponents argue that business output will decline, but empirical data clearly demonstrates that shorter work hours yield higher efficiency and better overall performance.
Passage 2: The Risks of a Four-Day Workweek
By Sarah Jenkinson
While a four-day workweek sounds appealing, implementing it across all industries is impractical and risky. Many operational sectors, such as healthcare, emergency services, and customer support, require continuous coverage. Shortening the workweek in these fields would require hiring additional staff, creating severe financial strain for small businesses and public services.
A survey conducted by the National Business Association found that 48% of managers expressed concern over missed deadlines when attempting compressed schedules. Furthermore, compressing 40 hours of work into four days leads to longer 10-hour workdays, which actually increases physical fatigue and stress. Without substantial evidence proving its feasibility across all sectors, jumping into a four-day model is an irresponsible business decision.
Part 2: Essay Prompt (မေးခွန်း)
> Task: Analyze the arguments presented in both passages. Determine which position is better supported with evidence and explain why. Support your analysis with specific examples and evidence directly from both texts.
>
Part 3: Model High-Scoring Response (ဖြေဆိုပုံ အဖြေနမူနာ)
Mark Jenkins presents a significantly stronger and more persuasive argument in favor of the four-day workweek compared to Sarah Jenkinson’s counterargument. Jenkins effectively backs his claims with concrete statistical data, whereas Jenkinson relies heavily on generalized concerns and less compelling evidence.
The primary strength of Jenkins' argument lies in his use of specific empirical data. He cites a 2022 study in the United Kingdom involving 61 companies, noting that 92% chose to keep the four-day model after the trial. He further strengthens his position by highlighting measurable outcomes: a 35% increase in company revenue and a 71% drop in employee burnout. These specific percentages provide tangible proof that the four-day model enhances productivity and employee well-being without harming business performance.
In contrast, Jenkinson’s argument relies on weaker logic and less rigorous support. She mentions a survey from the National Business Association where 48% of managers expressed concern over missed deadlines. However, expressing a "concern" before implementation is an opinion, not concrete proof that performance actually suffered. Furthermore, Jenkinson focuses primarily on specific sectors like healthcare and customer support, generalizing these challenges to argue against the model as a whole. While her point regarding 10-hour workdays is valid, she fails to provide statistical data showing that fatigue in a compressed schedule outweighs the benefits reported in Jenkins' cited research.
4August 27, 2026 977 18
