Some believe that the government should support artists like musicians, painters, and poets, while others argue that this is a misuse of funds.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Over the last few decades, the choice between providing governmental support for the artistic sphere and preventing the waste of governmental money has become increasingly relevant. Each approach offers distinct advantages that appeal to different people.
On the one hand, giving financial incentives to artists offers considerable advantages. In other words, this motivation may encourage them to spread local culture among youngsters and even in foreign countries. A prime example of this is Uzbekistan, where the government financially supports festivals like Sharq Taronalari in order to introduce its culture to the world. As a result, not only would juniors be closely engaged with their culture, but others may also learn about our culture.
On the other hand, saving the state budget provides equally important benefits. It is an undeniable fact that all countries may have certain challenges that require money to develop. For instance, environmental preservation is considered the top priority to invest in rather than the artistic sphere. As a consequence, supporting other areas of communities may bring major benefits.
In conclusion, although both approaches offer valuable merits, the ideal choice depends on individual circumstances and priorities.
