๐ When a state commits an amount equivalent to a very large share of its education allocation to recurring cash transfers, it raises an important question about fiscal prioritisation and the government's ability to expand long-term investments in schools, teachers, infrastructure and learning outcomes. ๐จ JHARKHAND allocates โน14,065 crore to womenโs cash transfersโnearly 75% of its โน18,815 crore education budget. (These are two separate budget allocations under different headsโโน14,065 crore for the womenโs cash-transfer scheme and โน18,815 crore for education; the comparison only highlights their relative fiscal size.) โก๏ธ Immediate welfare is important, but Jharkhand cannot build long-term human capital by under-investing in education. The real question is not welfare vs. womenโit is whether todayโs transfers are coming at the cost of tomorrowโs opportunities. โ๏ธ
When a state commits an amount equivalent to a very large share ofโฆ โ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ โ TG.ME
August 11, 2026 3.7K 10