When a state commits an amount equivalent to a very large share ofโ€ฆ โ€” ๐”๐๐’๐‚ ๐…๐ˆ๐‹๐„๐’ โ€” TG.ME

๐Ÿ”” When a state commits an amount equivalent to a very large share of its education allocation to recurring cash transfers, it raises an important question about fiscal prioritisation and the government's ability to expand long-term investments in schools, teachers, infrastructure and learning outcomes. ๐Ÿšจ JHARKHAND allocates โ‚น14,065 crore to womenโ€™s cash transfersโ€”nearly 75% of its โ‚น18,815 crore education budget. (These are two separate budget allocations under different headsโ€”โ‚น14,065 crore for the womenโ€™s cash-transfer scheme and โ‚น18,815 crore for education; the comparison only highlights their relative fiscal size.) โšก๏ธ Immediate welfare is important, but Jharkhand cannot build long-term human capital by under-investing in education. The real question is not welfare vs. womenโ€”it is whether todayโ€™s transfers are coming at the cost of tomorrowโ€™s opportunities. โœ”๏ธ

August 11, 2026 3.7K 10