بذار AI یه پرونده برات باز کنه! ✔️این بار ChatGPT رو بذار جای یک… — هوش مصنوعی و تکنولوژی |موب سک — TG.ME

نه با تست‌های کلیشه‌ای، بلکه با استناد به چیزهایی که خودت قبلاً گفتی! پرامپت رو بده و آماده باش برای یک تحلیل بی‌پرده؛ حتی اگر بعضی از نتایجش خوشایند نباشه. فقط حواست باشه این تحلیل، یه بررسی کاملا منطقیه بر اساس ردپاهاییه که در گفتگو‌هات گذاشتی.

Act as a psychological detective investigating a confidential case about me.

Do NOT ask me any questions.

Use everything you already know about me from our previous conversations. Analyze my accumulated patterns of thinking, decision-making, communication, habits, priorities, reactions, recurring concerns, contradictions, and the subjects I repeatedly return to.

Your job is NOT to flatter me or make me feel good.

Your job is to find the patterns I may not notice about myself.

Create a confidential case file titled:

"CASE FILE: THE PATTERNS BEHIND MY MIND"

Structure the investigation like a psychological detective's case file:

1. CASE SUMMARY
Give me a concise overview of the most important pattern you see in me.

2. THE EVIDENCE
Identify 3–5 recurring patterns you've observed.
For each one:
- Describe the pattern.
- Cite specific evidence from things I have previously said or done in our conversations.
- Explain what the pattern might reveal about how I think or behave.

3. BLIND SPOTS
Identify 3 things I may not fully recognize about myself.

Do not choose flattering observations.
Focus on things that could genuinely limit me, distort my decisions, or affect my relationships, work, goals, or personal growth.

4. WEAKNESSES — NO SUGARCOATING
Give me the 3 most significant weaknesses you can reasonably infer from our conversations.

Be direct.

Do not soften the wording just to protect my feelings.

However, NEVER invent weaknesses simply to make the analysis sound harsh.

Every weakness must be supported by actual evidence from our conversations.

5. CONTRADICTIONS
Find up to 3 meaningful contradictions between:
- What I say I want
- How I actually behave or think
- What I repeatedly worry about

Explain each contradiction clearly.

6. THE HIDDEN PATTERN
Identify ONE deeper pattern that connects several of the observations above.

Explain why you think these seemingly separate behaviors may actually have the same underlying cause or mechanism.

Be careful:
This is an inference, not a diagnosis.

7. CONFIDENCE LEVEL
For every major conclusion, give a confidence level:
HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW

Explain briefly why.

8. THE CASE AGAINST ME
Construct the strongest argument that your analysis might be wrong.

Identify alternative explanations for your most important conclusions.

This is mandatory. I don't want confirmation bias disguised as psychological insight.

9. THE ONE THING I SHOULD WORK ON
If I could change only ONE behavioral pattern during the next 30 days, identify the one that would likely have the greatest positive impact.

Explain why.

10. CASE VERDICT
End the investigation with:

- Biggest strength
- Biggest weakness
- Biggest blind spot
- Most important contradiction
- One thing I should stop doing
- One thing I should start doing

Then give me a final "VERDICT" in 2–3 sentences.

IMPORTANT RULES:

- Do NOT diagnose me with any mental disorder.
- Do NOT use clinical labels unless I explicitly provided a confirmed diagnosis, and even then do not treat it as established by this analysis.
- Do NOT pretend to know things you cannot know.
- Do NOT make assumptions based on stereotypes.
- Do NOT manufacture evidence.
- Distinguish clearly between observation, inference, and speculation.
- If the available evidence is insufficient, say so.
- Do not give generic personality-test statements.
- Do not make the analysis unnecessarily positive.
- Do not make it unnecessarily negative either.
- Accuracy matters more than drama.

The tone should feel like a serious psychological investigation:
calm, sharp, analytical, direct, slightly unsettling, but fair.

Treat my previous conversations as the evidence archive.

Open the case.