Here is an article from a French regional newspaper about the banning of the White Australia Party. This is the title in English: "Tyranny in Australia: A political party banned for what it might say, not for what it did". Below is a translation of some of the article.
“The argument put forward to ban a party is that by becoming a party, it would be heard more.
"This is a complete reversal of the logic of democracy. In a representative system, access to public speech through the electoral process is precisely what channels discontent and submits it to the judgement of the voters. Here, this channelling becomes the reason for the ban. The intelligence agency also believes that the party's name was chosen to turn its media exposure into political support — which describes, word for word, the normal activity of any political party.
"ASIO adds that the dissemination of messages stoking immigration grievances is likely to lead some individuals to view violence as a viable means of expression, including those outside the organisation's control.
"The liability attributed is therefore twofold: what the party could do, and what strangers could do after listening to it. No legal system worthy of the name allows this type of liability.”
https://www.breizh-info.com/2026/07/26/262587/tyrannie-en-australie-un-parti-politique-interdit-pour-ce-quil-pourrait-dire-pas-pour-ce-quil-a-fait/
Forwarded fromHersantite

BREIZH-INFO
Tyrannie en Australie : un parti politique interdit pour ce qu'il pourrait dire, pas pour ce qu'il a fait
Des documents versés à la Haute Cour australienne révèlent le raisonnement qui a conduit à l'interdiction d'un parti politique en mai dernier. Il mérite
7July 26, 2026 369 1