Channels

Top 100 Trending New

Categories

Crypto Gaming News Entertainment Music Sports Tech Gambling Bots and mini apps Finance Business Education Lifestyle Health Travel Auto Fashion Jobs Dating Deals and shopping

Stickers

Stickers Emoji Themes Wallpapers

Bots Gifts Tools

Currency

$ USD ₽ RUB € EUR ₴ UAH ₸ KZT ₺ TRY zł PLN ₪ ILS AED AED R$ BRL Rp IDR RM MYR ¥ JPY ₩ KRW CN¥ CNY

Theme

Português (Brasil)

Bahasa Indonesia

Беларуская

Українська

Channels Categories Stickers Bots Gifts Tools

Premium Wiki Glossary Legal

Notifications Settings Log in

ISK > Research: post #113 — TG.ME

ISK > Research@ISKResearch · 451 subscribers Open in TelegramOpen

از غم بمیریم رواست.

t.me/ISKResearch/113

November 17, 2022 288 4

More from this channel

این کانالی که راه اندازی شده قراره تئوری و ایدئولوژی ISK رو به صورت سیستماتیک توضیح بده و شفاف سازی کنه. تئوری که بر اساس اصول بازار آزاد و تجارت آزادانه در دنیای علم طراحی شده. ممنون میشم که کانال رو با دوستان دیگری که در دنیای علم هستند (دانشجو، استاد و غیره) به اشتراک بگذارید. ممنون میشم ما رو در مسیری به سوی دانش آزاد همراهی کنید. 135·Aug 14 The Unpriced Discipline To evaluate knowledge, its distribution, and its consumption through a market lens, one must first establish the key value scientific activities, and discoveries. In other words, where is the market? In classical economic, price reflects, scarcity: physical resources are rivalrous, meaning two parties cannot consume or utilize the exact sane tangible object simultaneously without conflict. In contrast, ideas, information, and knowledge are not rivalrous. If I know differentiation, it doesn't prevent you from knowing it. This simple observation shows that "to know" is not a capital on its own. Consequently, when intellectual property laws or paywalls impose a price on ideas, they create an artificial scarcity to simulate standard market behavior. Any free-market or libertarian critique of the scientific enterprise must confront this paradox. If the underlying product—knowledge itself—cannot naturally be priced, we must look deeper to determine where the true market operates. Therefore, to evaluate knowledge, its distribution, and its consumption through a market lens, one must first recognize that the fundamental unit of value is not knowledge itself, but the velocity of its acquisition. In classical terms, knowledge is non-rivalrous and non-scarce; a theory can be shared infinitely without diminishing in substance. However, this static view misses where the actual market cleared: in temporal priority and informational proximity. In research and development, value is highly time-sensitive. Possessing an insight six months before the wider community offers a decisive advantage—whether in commercializing technology, securing priority of discovery, or directing subsequent research vectors. @anarchoheurism #anheu #theory #unpricedDiscipline 132·Aug 14 ISK > Research pinned «Anarcho-heurism is the theory that scientific discovery should emerge through voluntary, decentralized competition in which claims, reputation, attention, and resources are allocated by the self-correcting market process of discovery rather than by central…»Aug 14 Anarcho-heurism Any scientific community, university, institution, or journal is ultimately trying to solve two problems: 1. How to guess the next step correctly. 2. How to evaluate other people's guesses. The first is discovery. The second is evaluation. Both require information that no single person or institution possesses. A committee cannot know in advance which hypothesis will become important, which obscure researcher will make a breakthrough, or which result will open an entirely new field. Much of this information is generated only through decentralized interaction between researchers. Anarcho-heurism therefore treats scientific discovery as a market process. Claims compete for attention. Researchers compete for credibility. Discoveries attract further discoveries. Successful predictions increase reputation; failed ones diminish it. Citation, replication, criticism, and extension continuously reallocate attention and credibility. This also exposes a fundamental problem with the modern journal system. A journal has no epistemic legitimacy merely by being a journal. Its editorial position does not make a claim true. Its peer-review process does not make a claim valuable. Its prestige does not constitute evidence. At most, a journal is an intermediary that provides a particular mechanism for filtering and distributing scientific work. If that mechanism is valuable, researchers should voluntarily use it. If another mechanism is better, researchers should be free to replace it. The legitimacy of scientific evaluation therefore cannot come from institutional position. It must come from demonstrated epistemic performance. Anarcho-heurism does not require the abolition of journals. It removes their claim to privileged authority. In this channel we're going to discuss Anarcho-heurism, from first principles to objections, empirical observations and more. @anarchoheurism #anheu #start #theory 135·Aug 13 Feel free to join and help us with the theory of Anheu 153·Aug 13

An open web layer over public Telegram — search, stats and channel reading right in your browser, no account, no install.

Not affiliated with Telegram FZ-LLC; all data comes from public sources.

Catalog

Top channels Categories Countries Search

Content

Stickers Emoji Gifts Themes Wallpapers

Help

Tools Wiki Glossary Blockchain Safety Premium Advertisers Advertising

© 2026 TG.ME · G.Media network· Updated 08/23/2026 · v0.2.0 · ba12f6a

Privacy Terms DMCA & complaints Report a violation

Similar channels

جزوات درسی فیزیک901 subscribers

انجمن علمی فيزيک دانشگاه تهران3.1K subscribers

Foundations of physics (Kazemi)734 subscribers

اقوال الانعام39.2K subscribers

انجمن علمی فیزیک بهشتی (SBU)3.2K subscribers

انجمن علمی-دانشجویی ریاضی دانشگاه تهران2.5K subscribers

Anarconomy46.9K subscribers

Dungeon696 subscribers