Two smoking guns. The facts changed. The recognition did not. The… — Martin Geddes Channel — TG.ME

Two smoking guns.

The facts changed. The recognition did not.

The classifier was removed. The recognition did not.

So what was the court actually recognising—and what envelope contains a court when “child custody” no longer explains what it did?

https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/two-smoking-guns-and-just-one-envelope
Martingeddes
Two smoking guns, and just one envelope
Was it really a child-custody case under ordinary civil authority—or does the evidence point somewhere else entirely?
August 24, 2026 1.2K 8