§5.2. The conditions for objectivity are outlined in Kantian criticism; in Hegelian dialectics, being all about effectivity, formal possibility is the internal self-reflection of said effectivity. Thus, the Logos is fully ontologized. At the time of Heidegger’s turn, the contradictions of modernity have already revealed dark directions it moves on. By the distinction between the ontological and the ontic, we now seek fundamental-ontology, for the historical matter of Spirit was resolved by Hegel.
§5.3. Not by chance, the most powerful fruit of bourgeois revolutionism, the nation-state, is disintegrating in real time, currently insisting on pivotal states by a neo-stalinist, simultaneously dog-eat-dog and interdependent model of politics. The transition is said to result, in the future, into a world-council composed by “civilizational” great-spaces, but that is up to further juridical formal definitions.
https://nukesinspace.substack.com/p/being-and-capital-draft
August 15, 2026 110 1
