Channels

Top 100 Trending New

Categories

Crypto Gaming News Entertainment Music Sports Tech Gambling Bots and mini apps Finance Business Education Lifestyle Health Travel Auto Fashion Jobs Dating Deals and shopping

Stickers

Stickers Emoji Themes Wallpapers

Bots Gifts Tools

Currency

$ USD ₽ RUB € EUR ₴ UAH ₸ KZT ₺ TRY zł PLN ₪ ILS AED AED R$ BRL Rp IDR RM MYR ¥ JPY ₩ KRW CN¥ CNY

Theme

Português (Brasil)

Bahasa Indonesia

Беларуская

Українська

Channels Categories Stickers Bots Gifts Tools

Premium Wiki Glossary Legal

Notifications Settings Log in

Crypto AI/AGI/ASI: post #2842 — TG.ME

Crypto AI/AGI/ASI@cryptoAIAGI · 1.1M subscribers Open in TelegramOpen

t.me/cryptoAIAGI/2842

August 29, 2026 192

More from this channel

[media post] 17·Sep 1 🔍 MYTH BUSTER: Why Most AI Agents Will Fail Stop falling for the hype. Here's what the data actually shows about AI agents in crypto and trading. ❌ MYTH 1: AI agents can fully replace human traders ✅ REALITY: The best performing trading funds still use humans to set strategy, manage risk, and make final calls. Benchmark data from Renaissance Technologies to Citadel shows that even their most sophisticated quant systems have human risk managers vetting positions. Pure autonomous trading bots have a documented failure rate of 40-60% within first 6 months of deployment. ❌ MYTH 2: Autonomous agents don't need human oversight ✅ REALITY: Every serious agent deployment in production has humans in the loop — whether it's monitoring dashboard alerts, circuit breakers, or review queues. The FTX collapse and recent MEV exploits happened partly because automation ran without proper guardrails. Oversight isn't bureaucracy; it's how you don't lose millions in 3 hours. ❌ MYTH 3: More autonomy equals better performance ✅ REALITY: Agents with constrained action spaces and decision trees actually outperform fully autonomous ones. Research from OpenAI and Anthropic shows that agents with clear boundaries, limited tool access, and escalation paths to humans achieve 25-40% better reliability scores than unrestricted agents. ❌ MYTH 4: AI agents understand market context like humans ✅ REALITY: Agents hallucinate patterns that don't exist and miss macro context that 15-year-old traders intuitively grasp. They can't feel when sentiment has shifted on Discord before it hits price, or why a black swan event matters. They're statistical engines, not market natives. They'll spot arbitrage opportunities better than you, but they'll also get wiped out in ways humans would never. ❌ MYTH 5: Agent frameworks are all equally capable ✅ REALITY: There's a massive gap between Anthropic's Claude Opus with native tool use versus slapped-together LangChain chains with function calling. Latency, hallucination rates, and instruction-following differ wildly. Your agent's performance depends 60% on framework choice and 40% on your prompt engineering. The real lesson: The agents that actually work aren't autonomous. They're augmented. They handle volume, pattern recognition, and execution speed while humans handle judgment, risk appetite, and context. Treat your agent as a co-pilot, not a replacement pilot, and you won't end up like the next failed trading bot listed on postmortem blogs. Which myth surprised you the most? 👇 #AI #artificialintelligence #AGI #machinelearning #tech #future 14·Sep 1

[media post] 6·Sep 1 [media post] 248·Aug 31 🔍 MYTH BUSTER: 5 Things People Get Wrong About GPT & LLMs # STOP FALLING FOR THESE MYTHS ABOUT GPTs AND LLMs Your timeline is full of AI takes that sound smart but crumble under scrutiny. Here's what you actually need to know. ❌ MYTH: LLMs are just fancy autocomplete with no real use ✅ REALITY: This talking point died around 2022. LLMs are being deployed for protein folding (AlphaFold 2), legal document review, medical diagnostics, and billion-dollar code generation at enterprise scale. OpenAI's o1 can solve IMO-level math problems that require actual reasoning, not pattern matching. If it were "just autocomplete," companies wouldn't be spending millions integrating them into production systems. ❌ MYTH: ChatGPT and Claude have real-time internet access ✅ REALITY: They don't. ChatGPT's knowledge cutoff is April 2024 (GPT-4o), Claude 3.5 is April 2024. Neither model can browse the web by default—they can only work with information in your prompt or via plugins you explicitly enable. When they cite recent events, they're hallucinating or you're feeding them the data. This matters: if you're relying on these for live market analysis without providing feeds, you're flying blind. ❌ MYTH: AI remembers every conversation you ever had ✅ REALITY: Each conversation starts from zero. Your chat history exists on OpenAI/Anthropic's servers for safety/improvement, but the model itself has zero memory between sessions. This is actually a feature for privacy, but it also means you need to re-context everything if you want continuity. Long-context models (Claude 200k tokens) help, but they're not true memory—they're just bigger windows. ❌ MYTH: Open-source models are always worse than closed ones ✅ REALITY: Llama 3.1 405B matches or beats GPT-4 on many benchmarks. Mistral's models are punching above their weight class. The gap exists in certain domains (reasoning, instruction-following at scale), but saying "open = worse" ignores that you can fine-tune, run locally, and own your data with open models—advantages that matter for crypto and finance applications where privacy and control are non-negotiable. ❌ MYTH: LLMs will hit a plateau and stop improving dramatically ✅ REALITY: We said this about neural networks in 2016. We were wrong. Scaling laws still hold (more compute + data = better performance). Newer architectures (mixture of experts, test-time compute) are opening new frontiers. The bottleneck isn't the paradigm—it's energy, hardware, and quality training data. Until one of those hard stops, expect continued acceleration. Here's the meta-lesson: Most LLM myths exist because people extrapolate from their first interaction with ChatGPT. These models are advancing faster than takes about them. Stay skeptical of both hype and doom—the truth is usually in the details. Which myth surprised you the most? 👇 #AI #artificialintelligence #AGI #machinelearning #tech #future 224·Aug 31

An open web layer over public Telegram — search, stats and channel reading right in your browser, no account, no install.

Not affiliated with Telegram FZ-LLC; all data comes from public sources.

Catalog

Top channels Categories Countries Search

Content

Stickers Emoji Gifts Themes Wallpapers

Help

Tools Wiki Glossary Blockchain Safety Premium Advertisers Advertising

© 2026 TG.ME · G.Media network· Updated 09/01/2026 · v0.2.0 · 9f46945

Privacy Terms DMCA & complaints Report a violation

Similar channels

AI Crypto Edge15.3K subscribers

AI Tools Daily10.2K subscribers

Blockchain & GenAI are Stupid3.3K subscribers

Crypto Daily News3.3K subscribers

AI Stack Digest — AI News, Tools & Guides9 subscribers

AILogs1M subscribers

Naturally Artificial by Sergey Osipov7K subscribers

Signals, News, Charts and Mindset1.3K subscribers