Also, I'd like to take this as an opportunity to comment on the confusions spread around the Chinese net on the NCC. Some are claiming that 'the organisation might be propped up by the state' without any evidence, except arguing that ideological struggle against an opportunist in the 'human rights movement' would be unfamiliar, and its prior 'non-surfacing'. We can see in the MLM mass movement across multiple states that BSM, SFS, Nazariya all openly took a stand against the OLR of Vishwavijay and Seema Azad. In fact they released statements and articles on the matter, as well as exposures of the OLR by Prashant Rahi.
I'd further like to direct attention to the anti-Marxist nature of the statement in support of Seema Azad, which talked emptily of 'commitment to the constitution', 'completely legal work', 'zero affliation with party', etc. There is no reason to believe that the struggle waged by NCC, whose condemnations align with established actors in the MLM mass movement which too, faced severe state repression, is 'state-aided'. It has no basis in reality. Regarding the PoMo booklet by the NCC, as Marxists a principled position from fraternal movements/organisations would be – where there are severe disagreements – to express their critical comments and open a polemic on the matter just as CPI (Maoist) did with ICL through its letter. But discarding it without ideological criticism based on disagreement is an incorrect position. The claim that NCC is 'state-propped' has no evidence.
Forwarded fromN.
5July 24, 2026 1.5K
