Some observations regarding the enemy's announcement of controlling Ali al-Tahir hill:
According to the enemy's media and military analysts, whose sources are from the Israeli army, control was achieved a long time ago, but the announcement and permission to publish on the subject were made yesterday. I believe that yesterday's announcement was made in response to the Iranian threat published by Reuters, which stated that any attack on Ali al-Tahir would be met with an Iranian response.
The enemy army's announcement of its control over the high ground means that it has completed evacuating the two paths it previously talked about, it means that it has secured them, and it means, in my opinion, that it is working on preparing them for detonation.
The timing of the announcement is not related to the Israeli elections, although Netanyahu will benefit from it, but so far all of Netanyahu's "achievements" have proven not to increase his seats to more than 24.
The occupation of Ali al-Tahir hill is not the last battle, and even if Israel occupies Lebanon, this does not mean it is the last battle. The main battle is one of willpower, and what the enemy wants is to break our willpower. If we remain in a small area in northern Lebanon and continue to fight, or if we do not remain anywhere and continue to say "no", this is enough.
The main problem in the entire Ali al-Tahir issue is the media handling of it, portraying it as a final battle, which was a mistake.
What is required now is not to exaggerate the Israeli achievement, nor deny or belittle it, out of respect for our minds.
Forwarded fromQassem S. Qassem
5
3September 4, 2026 287 2
