2) “The dissemination of this message was my life insurance,” Forbes stated, arguing that the more people who knew about the potential threat, the safer he would be. AlertChannel amplified Forbes’ warning by reposting it and urging other major accounts to do the same, which many did. It was a moment of solidarity, but also one that may have put both Forbes and AlertChannel in the crosshairs of powerful forces.
An Explosive Rise
Before the Space, Forbes was a relatively unknown figure on X, with around 18,000 followers. But after the event, everything changed. His theories gained traction, his comments went viral, and his follower count skyrocketed. Today, Forbes boasts over 250,000 followers, a meteoric rise that raises as many eyebrows as it inspires curiosity.
The recording of the Space is still available on Forbes’ YouTube channel (Link to the recording). However, while Forbes’ commentary can be heard, the voices of the other speakers, including Kim Dotcom, are notably absent from the recording—except for a brief segment at the beginning featuring AlertChannel as the host setting up the session.
Kim Dotcom: A Sudden Change
Kim Dotcom’s behavior after the Space is another unsettling twist in this story. Once a vocal supporter of Forbes’ theories about the MH370 disappearance, Dotcom turned into a staunch opponent shortly after the Space.
This abrupt shift raises significant questions: Was Dotcom pressured? Or was it merely a personal change of heart? Dotcom later revealed that he had suffered a stroke, leaving him physically incapacitated. While this explanation might be plausible, the timing of his withdrawal and change of stance remains deeply suspicious.
Surveillance and Secret Groups: The Dark Underbelly of X
A shadow hangs over X, and the story of AlertChannel is just the tip of the iceberg. Investigations by private users suggest that X might be more than a social media platform—it could be a surveillance tool.
Reports from administrators of banned accounts reveal a disturbing pattern: In many cases, there were no public rule violations to justify the bans. Instead, evidence points to the reading of private messages, which were then seemingly used as grounds for account suspensions.
Additionally, users have gathered screenshots and other evidence indicating the existence of secret groups on X. These groups appear to have a clear agenda: identifying critical voices, spreading disinformation, and orchestrating targeted account takedowns. Curiously, many members of these groups display Ukrainian flags in their profiles, suggesting potential ties to state-supported actors—possibly intelligence agencies.
A Puppet on Display?
One lingering question remains: Is Elon Musk truly in control of X, or is he merely a figurehead, while others pull the strings behind the scenes? The collaboration between X and these secret groups hints at a level of manipulation far beyond what the public perceives.
Conclusion: The Guardian Has Fallen, but the Questions Persist
The suspension of AlertChannel on election night may seem like an isolated act, but its implications are far-reaching. This isn’t just about one account—it’s about power, control, and the manipulation of information in an increasingly digital world.
Is it all just coincidence? Or are we witnessing the dawn of a new era of surveillance and censorship?
