“Cardiac outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2 vaccination in adolescents and young adults: a cohort study of 4 million individuals”
Is so outrageously flawed raising the question whether Vaccine is a scientific journal or purely propaganda operations.
The study attempts to convince us that the risk of myocarditis is higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection versus COVID vaccination and that in fact vaccination reduces the risk…
They consider the period Dec 2020 throughout Sep 2025 and guess what:
1) More than 93% of the study participants are UNINFECTED!!!
2) Less than 7% are VACCINATED!!!
This is clearly an impossibility!
How did they do that:
1) They only consider vaccinated individuals who were either uninfected or infected prior to vaccination, eliminating most vaccinated individuals who were infected after vaccination from the analysis.
2) They only consider infected individuals who were seeking care, eliminating most of the infected individuals.
Broken science that is promoted by so called scientific journals and mainstream media!
I hope Vaccine will retract this paper soon to save something from its reputation.
Join 👉 https://t.me/RogerHodkinson
21
5
3
2
1
1August 30, 2026 798 18
