๐๐€๐“๐‘๐ˆ๐ŒลŒ๐๐ˆ๐”๐Œ โ€” ๐€๐๐“๐„-๐๐ˆ๐‚๐„๐๐„ ๐’๐“๐”๐ƒ๐ˆ๐„๐’ SERIESโ€ฆ โ€” Patrimลnium โ€” TG.ME

๐๐€๐“๐‘๐ˆ๐ŒลŒ๐๐ˆ๐”๐Œ โ€” ๐€๐๐“๐„-๐๐ˆ๐‚๐„๐๐„ ๐’๐“๐”๐ƒ๐ˆ๐„๐’

SERIES III.7: THE LANGUAGE OF LINEAGE โ€” HIPPOLYTUS

Race โ€ข Seed โ€ข Tribe

Unlike portions of the Apostolic Tradition, Hippolytusโ€™ Commentary on Daniel is substantially preserved in its original Greek. We are therefore able to examine his surviving Greek terminology directly rather than relying solely upon ancient Latin or other translations.

In III.6, Hippolytus describes the ancestry of the Anointed through the language of race, tribe, seed, forefathers, birth, and โ€œaccording to the flesh.โ€ The language deserves to be examined lexically.

ฮณฮญฮฝฮฟฯ‚
genos
โ€œrace โ€ข stock โ€ข family โ€ข lineageโ€

ฯƒฯ€ฮญฯฮผฮฑ
sperma
โ€œseed โ€ข offspring โ€ข descendantsโ€

ฯ†ฯ…ฮปฮฎ
phylฤ“
โ€œtribe โ€ข clanโ€

ฮบฮฑฯ„แฝฐ ฯƒฮฌฯฮบฮฑ
kata sarka
โ€œaccording to the fleshโ€


These terms do not occur in isolation. Hippolytus places them within his discussion of Levi and Judah, the joining of two tribes, righteous seed, Matthew tracing the ancestry of the Anointed, successive generations, forefathers, and finally his birth.

This context governs the vocabulary. ฮณฮญฮฝฮฟฯ‚ concerns lineage or stock; ฯƒฯ€ฮญฯฮผฮฑ expresses seed or offspring; ฯ†ฯ…ฮปฮฎ identifies tribal descent; and ฮบฮฑฯ„แฝฐ ฯƒฮฌฯฮบฮฑ explicitly locates the discussion โ€œaccording to the flesh.โ€

Thus Hippolytusโ€™ language of race and seed in this passage belongs to an explicitly genealogical argument concerning ancestry and descent, preserved for us substantially in the language in which he originally wrote.

Ad fontes.
III.6
August 11, 2026 33