Quick FAQ
Is Oroboros staying?
Yes. Oroboros is staying. It will continue as our perpetual and prop trading frontend, built on top of [REDACTED] infrastructure. The goal is to get Oroboros to v1 and stable before the full relaunch.
Is Saylis staying?
Yes. Saylis is staying. Saylis remains our onchain markets frontend and will use the same underlying [REDACTED] research, strategy, risk and execution infrastructure as the rest of the ecosystem.
Is Crucible staying?
Yes. Crucible remains the research and backtesting side of the ecosystem. If anything, it becomes more important as agents increasingly use it to test, compare and optimize strategies before deployment.
Is Tesseract staying?
Yes. Tesseract remains focused on prediction markets and the broader information/timeline side of the system.
Are all the products being renamed [REDACTED]?
No. [REDACTED] is the infrastructure and company underneath the products. Oroboros stays Oroboros, Saylis stays Saylis, Crucible stays Crucible, Tesseract stays Tesseract. They are different interfaces and products built on the same underlying system.
What happens to Jester?
Jester is not just being deleted from existence. The name has simply become too small to describe the entire company. Jester will move closer to its original lineage around strategies, algorithms and intelligence instead of being the name stretched across every product we build.
Are my strategies/automations going away?
No. We are not throwing away three years of development and starting again. Existing strategy, automation, portfolio, risk and execution infrastructure is what [REDACTED] is being built around.
Do I need to move to a completely different platform?
No. The whole point is basically the opposite. Oroboros, Saylis and the other interfaces will continue operating while the infrastructure underneath them becomes increasingly unified.
Is Telegram staying?
Yes. Telegram is another interface into the system. The long-term idea is that the terminal, Telegram, agents, MCP, APIs and third-party applications can all interact with the same [REDACTED] infrastructure.
Is this just a new website and logo?
No. The branding is probably the least important part. The company structure, revenue model, tokenomics, APIs, agent architecture and positioning are all changing to match what we have actually built.
Is the existing JEST token immediately changing?
No. Nothing is happening immediately. The full token migration/relaunch comes later, with proper details, snapshot rules, contracts and instructions published beforehand.
Do I need to do anything with my tokens right now?
No.
Do not send them anywhere. Do not respond to someone DMing you claiming you need to migrate early. When there is something holders need to do, we will announce it properly.
Are existing holders getting abandoned?
No. The point of the migration is to bring existing eligible holders forward into the new structure, not erase the existing community.
Is the 2% token fee staying?
The tokenomics are being redesigned as part of the relaunch. One of the major goals is to stop making the operating company almost entirely dependent on token trading fees while preserving a strong buyback/value-accrual mechanism for the token.
Full tokenomics will be released before migration.
Why not just keep the current token and change the company name?
Because the current structure is increasingly working against us. It makes operating revenue volatile and makes fundraising, marketing, market-making, partnerships and outside investment unnecessarily difficult. We have outgrown both the original brand and the economic structure around it.
Will [REDACTED] have subscriptions?
Yes. The current direction is free access plus paid tiers for serious operators, with increased compute, agents, automation, infrastructure access and reduced usage/execution costs.
Will agents have to buy subscriptions?
Not necessarily. External agents will also be able to consume individual [REDACTED] services through API/MCP and eventually pay for specific capabilities through x402. A machine should be able to pay for the exact thing it needs instead of pretending to be a human SaaS customer.
Are you abandoning retail users to chase enterprise?
No. Our own products are still important. The difference is that they are no longer the only way [REDACTED] can succeed. A normal trader can use Oroboros while a completely different company embeds the same [REDACTED] infrastructure into its own application.
Does this mean Oroboros/Saylis could eventually use the same account and agents?
They partially already do, that is the direction. The products are increasingly becoming different surfaces over the same underlying identity, portfolio, research, strategy, risk, agent and execution infrastructure rather than isolated applications.
When does all of this actually happen?
Gradually.
We are already consolidating the technology and branding, but there will not be a full relaunch until Oroboros reaches v1 and is stable, and the API/MCP system is mostly bug free and stable.
We would rather launch the new system when it is actually ready than rush a token and branding change.
So what am I losing?
Ideally, nothing useful.
Oroboros stays. Saylis stays. Crucible stays. Tesseract stays. The strategies and infrastructure stay. What changes is the system underneath them, the company around them, and the economics supporting all of it.
Forwarded fromScientio
August 17, 2026 96 2
